Skip to Main Content

Systematic Reviews

On This Page

On this page you will find:

  • Foundational information on the searching process for Systematic Reviews
  • Useful automation tools and platforms
  • Relevant AI tools 

Searching in Systematic Reviews

In Systematic Reviews, the searching process involves following a methodology that is strict, sensitive, and replicable. The aim is to find every article that meets your pre-defined eligibility criteria.  

Further reading: 

Key Databases

The following are commonly considered the core databases to search when undertaking a Systematic Review.

Based on: Bramer, W. M., Rethlefsen, M. L., Kleijnen, J., & Franco, O. H. (2017). Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study. Systematic Reviews, 6(1), 245. 

Consult with a librarian to choose the relevant databases for your project.

Specialist Databases

Depending on your topic, you may need to search additional specialist databases such as:

Tools & Resources for Systematic Review Searching

Automation Tools

AI for Systematic Reviews: Searching

Running full Systematic Review searches in AI search tools?

There are many AI research tools that can be useful for searching, however given the strict methodology of the Systematic Review process, there are some important reasons why it is not advisable to use AI searching tools to run the full Systematic Review searches. 

  1. A key requirement of a Systematic Review is that the protocol is reproducible. AI search tools are not capable of generating identical search results, therefore searches done in AI search tools cannot be reproduced reliably.
  2. AI tools are limited in their ability to correctly identify subject headings such as MeSH terms, and are completely unable to identify Emtree headings. 
  3. AI tools are limited in their ability to correctly identify the key concepts from a research question.

Because of this, NSLHD Libraries do not advise using AI search tools to run a systematic review search. However, there are other ways where it may be appropriate to use AI tools during the Systematic Review process.  


Citation searching

In Systematic Reviews, it is required that you conduct a citation search, in which you investigate all studies citing and cited by the studies you have found. It is best practice to carry out backwards and forwards citation searching on all studies found that meet the eligibility criteria through two citation databases.

See: Guidance on Terminology, Application, and Reporting of Citation Searching: the TARCIS Statement

There are many AI tools that can make the citation searching process easier by mapping citations within indexes, including: 

  • Consensus
  • Elicit
  • Inciteful
  • Lens.org
  • and more.

See our Literature Search and Mapping Tools in our AI in Research guide for more information on each tool. 

Further Reading - AI Search Tools

Further Reading

See the following article for a thorough evaluation of 59 database citation index tools:

  • Gusenbauer, M. (2024). Beyond Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: An evaluation of the backward and forward citation coverage of 59 databases' citation indices. Research Synthesis Methods, 15(5), 802-817. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1729 

In all of the above cases, AI tools should not be solely relied upon, and it is up to the researcher to check the output of the tool.